.. _under-sampling: ============== Under-sampling ============== .. currentmodule:: imblearn.under_sampling One way of handling imbalanced datasets is to reduce the number of observations from all classes but the minority class. The minority class is that with the least number of observations. The most well known algorithm in this group is random undersampling, where samples from the targeted classes are removed at random. But there are many other algorithms to help us reduce the number of observations in the dataset. These algorithms can be grouped based on their undersampling strategy into: - Prototype generation methods. - Prototype selection methods. And within the latter, we find: - Controlled undersampling - Cleaning methods We will discuss the different algorithms throughout this document. Check also :ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_under-sampling_plot_comparison_under_sampling.py`. .. _cluster_centroids: Prototype generation ==================== Given an original data set :math:`S`, prototype generation algorithms will generate a new set :math:`S'` where :math:`|S'| < |S|` and :math:`S' \not\subset S`. In other words, prototype generation techniques will reduce the number of samples in the targeted classes but the remaining samples are generated --- and not selected --- from the original set. :class:`ClusterCentroids` makes use of K-means to reduce the number of samples. Therefore, each class will be synthesized with the centroids of the K-means method instead of the original samples:: >>> from collections import Counter >>> from sklearn.datasets import make_classification >>> X, y = make_classification(n_samples=5000, n_features=2, n_informative=2, ... n_redundant=0, n_repeated=0, n_classes=3, ... n_clusters_per_class=1, ... weights=[0.01, 0.05, 0.94], ... class_sep=0.8, random_state=0) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 262), (2, 4674)] >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import ClusterCentroids >>> cc = ClusterCentroids(random_state=0) >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = cc.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 64), (2, 64)] The figure below illustrates such under-sampling. .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_comparison_under_sampling_001.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_comparison_under_sampling.html :scale: 60 :align: center :class:`ClusterCentroids` offers an efficient way to represent the data cluster with a reduced number of samples. Keep in mind that this method requires that your data are grouped into clusters. In addition, the number of centroids should be set such that the under-sampled clusters are representative of the original one. .. warning:: :class:`ClusterCentroids` supports sparse matrices. However, the new samples generated are not specifically sparse. Therefore, even if the resulting matrix will be sparse, the algorithm will be inefficient in this regard. Prototype selection =================== Prototype selection algorithms will select samples from the original set :math:`S`, generating a dataset :math:`S'`, where :math:`|S'| < |S|` and :math:`S' \subset S`. In other words, :math:`S'` is a subset of :math:`S`. Prototype selection algorithms can be divided into two groups: (i) controlled under-sampling techniques and (ii) cleaning under-sampling techniques. Controlled under-sampling methods reduce the number of observations in the majority class or classes to an arbitrary number of samples specified by the user. Typically, they reduce the number of observations to the number of samples observed in the minority class. In contrast, cleaning under-sampling techniques "clean" the feature space by removing either "noisy" or "too easy to classify" observations, depending on the method. The final number of observations in each class varies with the cleaning method and can't be specified by the user. .. _controlled_under_sampling: Controlled under-sampling techniques ------------------------------------ Controlled under-sampling techniques reduce the number of observations from the targeted classes to a number specified by the user. Random under-sampling ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ :class:`RandomUnderSampler` is a fast and easy way to balance the data by randomly selecting a subset of data for the targeted classes:: >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import RandomUnderSampler >>> rus = RandomUnderSampler(random_state=0) >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = rus.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 64), (2, 64)] .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_comparison_under_sampling_002.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_comparison_under_sampling.html :scale: 60 :align: center :class:`RandomUnderSampler` allows bootstrapping the data by setting ``replacement`` to ``True``. When there are multiple classes, each targeted class is under-sampled independently:: >>> import numpy as np >>> print(np.vstack([tuple(row) for row in X_resampled]).shape) (192, 2) >>> rus = RandomUnderSampler(random_state=0, replacement=True) >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = rus.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(np.vstack(np.unique([tuple(row) for row in X_resampled], axis=0)).shape) (181, 2) :class:`RandomUnderSampler` handles heterogeneous data types, i.e. numerical, categorical, dates, etc.:: >>> X_hetero = np.array([['xxx', 1, 1.0], ['yyy', 2, 2.0], ['zzz', 3, 3.0]], ... dtype=object) >>> y_hetero = np.array([0, 0, 1]) >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = rus.fit_resample(X_hetero, y_hetero) >>> print(X_resampled) [['xxx' 1 1.0] ['zzz' 3 3.0]] >>> print(y_resampled) [0 1] :class:`RandomUnderSampler` also supports pandas dataframes as input for undersampling:: >>> from sklearn.datasets import fetch_openml >>> df_adult, y_adult = fetch_openml( ... 'adult', version=2, as_frame=True, return_X_y=True) >>> df_adult.head() # doctest: +SKIP >>> df_resampled, y_resampled = rus.fit_resample(df_adult, y_adult) >>> df_resampled.head() # doctest: +SKIP :class:`NearMiss` adds some heuristic rules to select samples :cite:`mani2003knn`. :class:`NearMiss` implements 3 different types of heuristic which can be selected with the parameter ``version``:: >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import NearMiss >>> nm1 = NearMiss(version=1) >>> X_resampled_nm1, y_resampled = nm1.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 64), (2, 64)] As later stated in the next section, :class:`NearMiss` heuristic rules are based on nearest neighbors algorithm. Therefore, the parameters ``n_neighbors`` and ``n_neighbors_ver3`` accept classifier derived from ``KNeighborsMixin`` from scikit-learn. The former parameter is used to compute the average distance to the neighbors while the latter is used for the pre-selection of the samples of interest. Mathematical formulation ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Let *positive samples* be the samples belonging to the targeted class to be under-sampled. *Negative sample* refers to the samples from the minority class (i.e., the most under-represented class). NearMiss-1 selects the positive samples for which the average distance to the :math:`N` closest samples of the negative class is the smallest. .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_illustration_nearmiss_001.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_illustration_nearmiss.html :scale: 60 :align: center NearMiss-2 selects the positive samples for which the average distance to the :math:`N` farthest samples of the negative class is the smallest. .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_illustration_nearmiss_002.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_illustration_nearmiss.html :scale: 60 :align: center NearMiss-3 is a 2-steps algorithm. First, for each negative sample, their :math:`M` nearest-neighbors will be kept. Then, the positive samples selected are the one for which the average distance to the :math:`N` nearest-neighbors is the largest. .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_illustration_nearmiss_003.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_illustration_nearmiss.html :scale: 60 :align: center In the next example, the different :class:`NearMiss` variant are applied on the previous toy example. It can be seen that the decision functions obtained in each case are different. When under-sampling a specific class, NearMiss-1 can be altered by the presence of noise. In fact, it will implied that samples of the targeted class will be selected around these samples as it is the case in the illustration below for the yellow class. However, in the normal case, samples next to the boundaries will be selected. NearMiss-2 will not have this effect since it does not focus on the nearest samples but rather on the farthest samples. We can imagine that the presence of noise can also altered the sampling mainly in the presence of marginal outliers. NearMiss-3 is probably the version which will be less affected by noise due to the first step sample selection. .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_comparison_under_sampling_003.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_comparison_under_sampling.html :scale: 60 :align: center Cleaning under-sampling techniques ---------------------------------- Cleaning under-sampling methods "clean" the feature space by removing either "noisy" observations or observations that are "too easy to classify", depending on the method. The final number of observations in each targeted class varies with the cleaning method and cannot be specified by the user. .. _tomek_links: Tomek's links ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A Tomek's link exists when two samples from different classes are closest neighbors to each other. Mathematically, a Tomek's link between two samples from different classes :math:`x` and :math:`y` is defined such that for any sample :math:`z`: .. math:: d(x, y) < d(x, z) \text{ and } d(x, y) < d(y, z) where :math:`d(.)` is the distance between the two samples. :class:`TomekLinks` detects and removes Tomek's links :cite:`tomek1976two`. The underlying idea is that Tomek's links are noisy or hard to classify observations and would not help the algorithm find a suitable discrimination boundary. In the following figure, a Tomek's link between an observation of class :math:`+` and class :math:`-` is highlighted in green: .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_illustration_tomek_links_001.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_illustration_tomek_links.html :scale: 60 :align: center When :class:`TomekLinks` finds a Tomek's link, it can either remove the sample of the majority class, or both. The parameter ``sampling_strategy`` controls which samples from the link will be removed. By default (i.e., ``sampling_strategy='auto'``), it will remove the sample from the majority class. Both samples, that is that from the majority and the one from the minority class, can be removed by setting ``sampling_strategy`` to ``'all'``. The following figure illustrates this behaviour: on the left, only the sample from the majority class is removed, whereas on the right, the entire Tomek's link is removed. .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_illustration_tomek_links_002.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_illustration_tomek_links.html :scale: 60 :align: center .. _edited_nearest_neighbors: Editing data using nearest neighbours ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Edited nearest neighbours ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The edited nearest neighbours methodology uses K-Nearest Neighbours to identify the neighbours of the targeted class samples, and then removes observations if any or most of their neighbours are from a different class :cite:`wilson1972asymptotic`. :class:`EditedNearestNeighbours` carries out the following steps: 1. Train a K-Nearest neighbours using the entire dataset. 2. Find each observations' K closest neighbours (only for the targeted classes). 3. Remove observations if any or most of its neighbours belong to a different class. Below the code implementation:: >>> sorted(Counter(y).items()) [(0, 64), (1, 262), (2, 4674)] >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import EditedNearestNeighbours >>> enn = EditedNearestNeighbours() >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = enn.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 213), (2, 4568)] To paraphrase step 3, :class:`EditedNearestNeighbours` will retain observations from the majority class when **most**, or **all** of its neighbours are from the same class. To control this behaviour we set ``kind_sel='mode'`` or ``kind_sel='all'``, respectively. Hence, `kind_sel='all'` is less conservative than `kind_sel='mode'`, resulting in the removal of more samples:: >>> enn = EditedNearestNeighbours(kind_sel="all") >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = enn.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 213), (2, 4568)] >>> enn = EditedNearestNeighbours(kind_sel="mode") >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = enn.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 234), (2, 4666)] The parameter ``n_neighbors`` accepts integers. The integer refers to the number of neighbours to examine for each sample. It can also take a classifier subclassed from ``KNeighborsMixin`` from scikit-learn. When passing a classifier, note that, if you pass a 3-Nearest Neighbors classifier, only 2 neighbours will be examined for the cleaning, as the third sample is the one being examined for undersampling since it is part of the samples provided at `fit`. Repeated Edited Nearest Neighbours ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ :class:`RepeatedEditedNearestNeighbours` extends :class:`EditedNearestNeighbours` by repeating the algorithm multiple times :cite:`tomek1976experiment`. Generally, repeating the algorithm will delete more data:: >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import RepeatedEditedNearestNeighbours >>> renn = RepeatedEditedNearestNeighbours() >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = renn.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 208), (2, 4551)] The user can set up the number of times the edited nearest neighbours method should be repeated through the parameter `max_iter`. The repetitions will stop when: 1. the maximum number of iterations is reached, or 2. no more observations are removed, or 3. one of the majority classes becomes a minority class, or 4. one of the majority classes disappears during the undersampling. All KNN ~~~~~~~ :class:`AllKNN` is a variation of the :class:`RepeatedEditedNearestNeighbours` where the number of neighbours evaluated at each round of :class:`EditedNearestNeighbours` increases. It starts by editing based on 1-Nearest Neighbour, and it increases the neighbourhood by 1 at each iteration :cite:`tomek1976experiment`:: >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import AllKNN >>> allknn = AllKNN() >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = allknn.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 220), (2, 4601)] :class:`AllKNN` stops cleaning when the maximum number of neighbours to examine, which is determined by the user through the parameter `n_neighbors` is reached, or when the majority class becomes the minority class. In the example below, we see that :class:`EditedNearestNeighbours`, :class:`RepeatedEditedNearestNeighbours` and :class:`AllKNN` have similar impact when cleaning "noisy" samples at the boundaries between classes. .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_comparison_under_sampling_004.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_comparison_under_sampling.html :scale: 60 :align: center .. _condensed_nearest_neighbors: Condensed nearest neighbors ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ :class:`CondensedNearestNeighbour` uses a 1 nearest neighbor rule to iteratively decide if a sample should be removed :cite:`hart1968condensed`. The algorithm runs as follows: 1. Get all minority samples in a set :math:`C`. 2. Add a sample from the targeted class (class to be under-sampled) in :math:`C` and all other samples of this class in a set :math:`S`. 3. Train a 1-Nearest Neigbhour on :math:`C`. 4. Go through the samples in set :math:`S`, sample by sample, and classify each one using a 1 nearest neighbor rule (trained in 3). 5. If the sample is misclassified, add it to :math:`C`, and go to step 6. 6. Repeat steps 3 to 5 until all observations in :math:`S` have been examined. The final dataset is :math:`S`, containing all observations from the minority class and those from the majority that were miss-classified by the successive 1-Nearest Neigbhour algorithms. The :class:`CondensedNearestNeighbour` can be used in the following manner:: >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import CondensedNearestNeighbour >>> cnn = CondensedNearestNeighbour(random_state=0) >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = cnn.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 24), (2, 115)] :class:`CondensedNearestNeighbour` is sensitive to noise and may add noisy samples (see figure later on). One Sided Selection ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In an attempt to remove the noisy observations introduced by :class:`CondensedNearestNeighbour`, :class:`OneSidedSelection` will first find the observations that are hard to classify, and then will use :class:`TomekLinks` to remove noisy samples :cite:`hart1968condensed`. :class:`OneSidedSelection` runs as follows: 1. Get all minority samples in a set :math:`C`. 2. Add a sample from the targeted class (class to be under-sampled) in :math:`C` and all other samples of this class in a set :math:`S`. 3. Train a 1-Nearest Neighbors on :math:`C`. 4. Using a 1 nearest neighbor rule trained in 3, classify all samples in set :math:`S`. 5. Add all misclassified samples to :math:`C`. 6. Remove Tomek Links from :math:`C`. The final dataset is :math:`S`, containing all observations from the minority class, plus the observations from the majority that were added at random, plus all those from the majority that were miss-classified by the 1-Nearest Neighbors algorithms. Note that differently from :class:`CondensedNearestNeighbour`, :class:`OneSidedSelection` does not train a K-Nearest Neighbors after each sample is misclassified. It uses the 1-Nearest Neighbors from step 3 to classify all samples from the majority in 1 pass. The class can be used as:: >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import OneSidedSelection >>> oss = OneSidedSelection(random_state=0) >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = oss.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 174), (2, 4404)] Our implementation offers the possibility to set the number of observations to put at random in the set :math:`C` through the parameter ``n_seeds_S``. :class:`NeighbourhoodCleaningRule` will focus on cleaning the data than condensing them :cite:`laurikkala2001improving`. Therefore, it will used the union of samples to be rejected between the :class:`EditedNearestNeighbours` and the output a 3 nearest neighbors classifier. The class can be used as:: >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import NeighbourhoodCleaningRule >>> ncr = NeighbourhoodCleaningRule(n_neighbors=11) >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = ncr.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 193), (2, 4535)] .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_comparison_under_sampling_005.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_comparison_under_sampling.html :scale: 60 :align: center .. _instance_hardness_threshold: Additional undersampling techniques ----------------------------------- Instance hardness threshold ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ **Instance Hardness** is a measure of how difficult it is to classify an instance or observation correctly. In other words, hard instances are observations that are hard to classify correctly. Fundamentally, instances that are hard to classify correctly are those for which the learning algorithm or classifier produces a low probability of predicting the correct class label. If we removed these hard instances from the dataset, the logic goes, we would help the classifier better identify the different classes :cite:`smith2014instance`. :class:`InstanceHardnessThreshold` trains a classifier on the data and then removes the samples with lower probabilities :cite:`smith2014instance`. Or in other words, it retains the observations with the higher class probabilities. In our implementation, :class:`InstanceHardnessThreshold` is (almost) a controlled under-sampling method: it will retain a specific number of observations of the target class(es), which is specified by the user (see caveat below). The class can be used as:: >>> from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression >>> from imblearn.under_sampling import InstanceHardnessThreshold >>> iht = InstanceHardnessThreshold(random_state=0, ... estimator=LogisticRegression( ... solver='lbfgs', multi_class='auto')) >>> X_resampled, y_resampled = iht.fit_resample(X, y) >>> print(sorted(Counter(y_resampled).items())) [(0, 64), (1, 64), (2, 64)] :class:`InstanceHardnessThreshold` has 2 important parameters. The parameter ``estimator`` accepts any scikit-learn classifier with a method ``predict_proba``. This classifier will be used to identify the hard instances. The training is performed with cross-validation which can be specified through the parameter ``cv`. .. note:: :class:`InstanceHardnessThreshold` could almost be considered as a controlled under-sampling method. However, due to the probability outputs, it is not always possible to get the specified number of samples. The figure below shows examples of instance hardness undersampling on a toy dataset. .. image:: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/images/sphx_glr_plot_comparison_under_sampling_006.png :target: ./auto_examples/under-sampling/plot_comparison_under_sampling.html :scale: 60 :align: center